What does the BIBLE say? (Documentare)
What does the BIBLE say?
1. If Jesus was a Hebrew than, which is THE NATIVE LANGUAGE OF JESUS?
Question:
Which was the "native" language of our Lord Jesus: hebrew or aramaic?
International Standard Version
Many Jews read this inscription, because the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city. It was written in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek.
Literal Standard Version
therefore many of the Jews read this title, because the place was near to the city where Jesus was crucified, and it was having been written in Hebrew, in Greek, in Latin.
Majority Standard Bible
Many of the Jews read this sign, because the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and it was written in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin.
New American Bible
Now many of the Jews read this inscription, because the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city; and it was written in Hebrew, Latin, and Greek.
Webster's Bible Translation
Many of the Jews then read this title: for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city: and it was written in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin.
Weymouth New Testament
Many of the Jews read this notice, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and the notice was in three languages--Hebrew, Latin, and Greek.
World English Bible
Therefore many of the Jews read this title, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city; and it was written in Hebrew, in Latin, and in Greek.
Young's Literal Translation
this title, therefore, read many of the Jews, because the place was nigh to the city where Jesus was crucified, and it was having been written in Hebrew, in Greek, in Roman.
Answer> A neo-hebrew (a mix of hebrew and Aramaic), named >Hebrew.
http://www.hebrew4christians.com/Articles/Jesus_Hebrew/jesus_hebrew.html
http://www.ccsom.org/languageofjesus/EloiLamaShabachtani.htm
---
2. Was our Lord Jesus in the Paradise in
that day when he died?
According to many modern time Bible translations, our Lord Jesus was in the
Paradise, in the first day of his death: Luke 23:43. But where was that
Paradise? On Earth was not yet. So, could be in Heaven? But this is in
contradiction with John 20:17. Or maybe the heavenly Paradise are without God,
his Father? This is a nonsens.
What is the truth, now?
In Luke 23:43 according to the early, second century Codex Curetonianus is:
"I say today to you, you will be with me in paradise". This translation
is in harmony with John 20:17, so this is the real saying of our Lord Jesus.
This text, which may be as early as the second century, is written in the
oldest and classical form of the Syriac alphabet, called Esrangelo, without
vowel points.
In our Bibles is in other form. Why? What happened with the text?
We have just two variants:
1.The text was misunderstood
2.The text was altered to support the pagan dogma of the immortal soul
---
3. What do you think about The Anointed
One?
(Matthew 22:42)
While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, saying: What think ye of Messiah? Whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David.
He saith unto them: How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying: «Yhwh said unto my Lord ( Aw-done'), Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool»? (Psalm 110:1)
If David then call him „my Lord” (Aw-done'), how is he his son?
And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions.
Another verse related to this Psalm is Proverbs 30:4.
“Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? Who hath gathered the wind in his fists? Who hath bound the waters in a garment? Who hath established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and what is his son's (bene) name, if thou canst tell?”
---
4. Only God is "divine" from a
Biblical perspective?
Many people believe that only God is "divine" and because the Son of
God (Jesus) is divine, he is God himself. But, according to the Bible, even
humans could be "divine nature", if God (through his qualities) is
inside of that humans, so, to be a "divine nature" is not equal to be
God himself, nor a "part" of God himself. This disprove the Trinity
doctrine.
See please 2Peter 1:4&1John 4:4:
Young's Literal Translation
through which to us the most great and precious promises have been given, that through these ye may become partakers of a divine nature, having escaped from the corruption in the world in desires.
Young's Literal Translation
Ye -- of God ye are, little children, and ye have overcome them; because greater is He (God) who is in you, than he (Satan) who is in the world.
Now, please compare "ye may become partakers of a divine nature" with
"He (God) who is in you" and answer this question:
We will be God himself because God is in us and we have divine nature?
If your answer is no, why then the Son of God is God himself, because he have
divine nature and God is in him?
Also, read the following verse and answer the question, please:
Young's Literal Translation 1John 3:2
beloved, now, children of God are we, and it was not yet manifested what we shall be, and we have known that if he may be manifested, like him we shall be, because we shall see him as he is;
In this verse is written that "like him we shall be". So, we shall be
even Jesus himself? No??? Why then, if Jesus is like his Father, he is God
himself?
---
5. What should know oneness "Jesus
only", trinitarians, unitarians, etc. about the word "god" from
John 1:1 part c "and the word was god"?
Many people believe in "God's incarnation" (oneness "Jesus
only", trinitarians, etc.) or in God's literal words - as God's plan
incarnation (unitarians, socinians, christadelphians, etc.) because they don't
understand John 1:1 part c "and the word was god" and they do this
because not understand a very simple way of saying. For example Satan is
"the god (the same word like in John 1:1 part c) of this age",
according to 2Corinthians 4:4. Satan is God, like the Father, or just
"god"? Again, Peter was named "satan" by Jesus, according
to Matthew.16:23. Is Peter Satan, the Devil or just "satan"?
When in John 1:1 part c our Lord Jesus is named "god" is in this way
of saying:
John 10:
25Jesus answered, “I did tell you, but you do not believe. The miracles I do in my Father’s name speak for me, 26but you do not believe because you are not my sheep. 27My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me. 28I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one can snatch them out of my hand. 29My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than alld; no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand. 30I and the Father are one.”
31Again the Jews picked up stones to stone him, 32but Jesus said to them, “I have shown you many great miracles from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?”
33“We are not stoning you for any of these,” replied the Jews, “but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God.”
34Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your Law, ‘I have said you are gods’e? 35If he called them ‘gods,’ to whom the word of God came—and the Scripture cannot be broken— 36what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, ‘I am God’s Son’? 37Do not believe me unless I do what my Father does. 38But if I do it, even though you do not believe me, believe the miracles, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father.” 39Again they tried to seize him, but he escaped their grasp.
What is the problem with the word "god" from John 1:1 part c? This
word (god) could be used or was used just in connection with God Almighty? No!
I don't know why it is so hard for trinitarinans and unitarians to accept an
apart way of saying? The first man, Adam, after his eartly nature was named
"man" (wich means a kind of soil), and of course his sons are all
named after his nature: man. If the sons of Adam have the eartly, Adam-like,
Adam-nature, why the heavenly Son of God could not have the heavenly God-like,
God (Divine)-nature? The sons of Adam are not Adam, so, the son of God are not
God. Of course, when the Son of God came in this world he put down his
God-nature, and put up the Adam-nature, so, he became a simple man, like the
first man, Adam, special, pure and without sin. If we understand right John 1:1
part c, the whole message of John 1:1 is so simple, so wonderful, so true: God
have a heavenly Son (son in literal meaning, see please Hebrews 1:3), who have
the same nature as his Father. This Son came down from heaven, not God, nor a
"God's plan".
Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down?
Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands?
Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak?
Who has established all the ends of the earth?
What is his name, and the name of his son?
Tell me if you know!
---
6. True Christians have one God, but
this is not Lord Jesus, he is the Son of this one God?
Matthew 4:10: "Jesus said to him,
'Away from me, Satan! For it is written: "Worship the Lord your God, and
serve him only."'"
John 17:3: "Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent."
1Corinthians 8:5-6: "For even if there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth (as indeed there are many "gods" and many "lords"), yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we live."
1Timothy 2:5: "For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus"
James 2:19: "You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that—and shudder."
---
7. Witnessing testimony only regarding
Lord Jesus?
"serving the Lord with all lowliness of mind, and with tears, and with
trials which befell me by the plots of the Jews; how I shrank not from
declaring unto you anything that was profitable, and teaching you publicly, and
from house to house, testifying both to Jews and to Greeks repentance toward
God, and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ. ASV Acts 20:19-21
This is more than clear for all who want the truth.
Compare with 1Corinthians 15:12-16 ASV:
"Now if Christ is preached that he hath been raised from the dead, how say
some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there is no
resurrection of the dead, neither hath Christ been raised: and if Christ hath
not been raised, then is our preaching vain, your faith also is vain. Yea, we
are found false witnesses of God; because we witnessed of God that he raised up
Christ: whom he raised not up, if so be that the dead are not raised. For if
the dead are not raised, neither hath Christ been raised:"
So, the early Christians have a witnessing testimony only regarding Lord Jesus?
Not at all. See the steps:
1.testifying both to Jews and to Greeks repentance toward God
2.and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ
Testimony for two persons not one.
But now, many so called Christianities talk just about Jesus. But what? That he is the Almighty God.
---
8. A reply and a question about the Son of God pre-human existence
Subject: Re:
To:
Date: Monday, June 14, 2010, 7:15 PM
"Thanks for sending, but it would be better to start with Luke 1:35 and Matt 1:18, 20.
Your Jesus is not human, but just dressed up as one.
Mary had a baby begotten, fathered in her. To beget means to cause to come into existence!
We have dealt with you various points in our two books.
It is very important to worship as Messiah the Jesus who began in Mary and your Jesus is not really human>\I Tim 2:5 is not so hard.
Again, start with Matt and LUke and Acts.
preexistence is a fog word: you cannot preexist yourself!
you are describing a transformation and not a begetting at all.
Better to believe Luke 1:25 and Matt 1:18, 20.
You underestimate the false translations in some Bibles of some passages in John.
X"
My reply
For good understanding, is must go to the whole Bible, not just in that text what we like.
Now, let me put to you a few questions.
First question:
Why in the ancient time, people believe that God must have a son?
Proverbs 30:
2“I am the most ignorant of men;
I do not have a man’s understanding.
3I have not learned wisdom,
nor have I knowledge of the Holy One.
4Who has gone up to heaven and come down?
Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands?
Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak?
Who has established all the ends of the earth?
What is his name, and the name of his son?
Tell me if you know!
---
9. An early version of John 1:1 in Bohairic Coptic language
In the Bohairic coptic, the first occurrence of "God" in John 1:1 is
in the Nomina Sacra form, whereas the second occurrence is spelled out. In John
1:18 the word "God" (which no one has seen) is in the Nomina Sacra
form, while the word "God" (only-begotten) is spelled out. These
early translators made a clear distinction, and knew how the text where
understood.
Youtube
---
10. In Isaiah 42:8 Jehovah God said he
will not give his glory to another.
This glory is against idol worship. But Jesus Christ, His onlybegotten Son received Jehovah's glory. Does that make Jesus Jehovah?
Answer:
Not unless the disciples are Jehovah as well.
(John 17:22) And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they
may be one, even as we are one:
John 10:30 Does being one with the Father make you Jehovah?
(John 10:30) I and my Father are one.
Answer:
Not unless the disciples are Jehovah as well!
(John 17:11) And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and
I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast
given me, that they may be one, as we are.
(John 17:23) I in them, and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one;
and that the world may know that thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as
thou hast loved me.
Youtube
---
11. The origin of Arian Christology
What is Arian Christology?
"Arian Christology—the nontrinitarian belief that Christ was an archangel who chose to become a human ..."
/arian-christology-754891.html
But Arius invented this Christology?
Raoul Vaneigem: "The Arab historian Shahrastani (Seventh Century) affirms
that, in the Fourth Century, Arius borrowed his doctrine, according to which
the Messiah is the first angel of God for the Magharians, "who lived four
hundred years before Arius and were known by the simplicity of their way of
life and their serene abstinence."
"Who were these Magharians, whose existence dates back to the First Century before the Christian era? Their Arab name leaves little doubt; it means "people of the cavern or the cave," because -- Shahrastani makes clear -- they hid their sacred texts in caverns."
"There is nothing surprising in the fact that the doctrine of the Angel-Messiah (the angelos-christos) was originally Essene, since it was shared by the [various] Christianities and predominated up to the historization of Jesus, undertaken in the second half of the Second Century."
Jesus is a "Wonderful Counsellor">
Of God or of Man?
Why?
The descriptive names of the onlybegotten Son of God from Isaiah 9:6 in Hebrew
transliteration:
pele-joez-el-gibbor-abi-ad-sar-shalom
Let's see!
pele-joez: wonderful counsellor
el gibbor (singular): means "hero" like in the Ezekiel 32:21
"elei gibborim" ("ei" and "im" is the plural
form)
NJB translate "elei gibborim" like “the mightiest heroes”.
So, "el-gibbor" is not "mighty god" is "mighty hero" (according to Wilhelm Gesenius)
abi-ad: our father forever
sar-shalom: "sar" means high commander or head commander not prince,
so the meaning is "(high) commander of peace"
Let's see again:
"For a child hath been born to us, a son hath been given to us, and the
princely power is on his shoulder, and he doth call his name Wonderful
Counsellor, Mighty Hero, Our Father Forever, Commander Of Peace."
Remember: "given to us". By who? And by why? Why is he wonderful
counsellor?
Let's see:
Isaiah 11:1,2 Young's Literal Translation
"And a rod hath come out from the stock of Jesse, And a branch from his roots is fruitful.
Rested on him hath the Spirit of Jehovah, The spirit of wisdom and understanding, The spirit of counsel and might, The spirit of knowledge and fear of Jehovah."
Now, who is this wonderful son? You are right! Ladies and gentlemen, He is Lord
Jesus Christ the only begotten Son of Jehovah God, the Father Almighty, the
awesome Creator of Heaven and Earth:
Luke 4:18 Young's Literal Translation
"The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, Because He did anoint me; To proclaim good news to the poor, Sent me to heal the broken of heart, To proclaim to captives deliverance, And to blind receiving of sight, To send away the bruised with deliverance, To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.' "
If the Son is a "son"...
If the Son is a son...
Trinitarians, like Adam Clarke, admits, if Lord Jesus is a "son" of God in literal sense, he must be "originated" and so, subordinate to God. This is what we as non-trinitarians strongly believe.
"Perhaps his most controversial position regarded the eternal Sonship of Jesus. Clarke did not believe it Biblically faithful to affirm this doctrine, maintaining that prior to the Incarnation, Jesus was "unoriginated." Otherwise, according to Clarke, he would be subordinate to God and therefore not fully divine. This was important to Clarke because he felt that Jesus' divinity was crucial to understanding the atonement."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Clarke
---
13. A list with John 1:1 translations
Expert: Janko - 9/1/2006
Question
Infro for you
A Non-Trinitarian Oneness Reference Library is Online---Check This Out
Who First Translated John1.1 Right =After The Nicene Creed Makers
SBT1- HAS DONE THE RESEARCH WORK FOR YOU---ENJOY !-
Some Say The Truth Hurts or Hurts There Cause.
Here is a List of Historical Bibles that The Oneness and Tri-ist Ignore.
IGNORING THIS HISIORICAL LIST OF---JOHN 1.1 –WHY ?
–Ask Those Who Do—
and Show Them This
(1) In a beginning was the Word, and the Word was with the God, and a god was the Word.
Diaglot
1865 Diaglot NT Free Downloads For Diaglot
C/H -open--- http://www.onlinebible.net/bibles2.html Online Now
See No.’s—52 THRU 56-For Whose in Harmony—And Online Now-
JOHN1onePLUS
No 1 --on Yahoo Search—Enter JOHN1onePLUS.htm
See at the Top of this page-Open
http://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=UTF-8&p=JOHN1onePLUS&xargs=0&pstart=1&fr=slv1-...
(2) Harwood, 1768, "and was himself a divine person"
(3) Newcome, 1808, "and the word was a god"
(4) Thompson, 1829, "the Logos was a god
(5) Goodspeed, 1939, "the Word was divine
(6) Torrey, 1947, "the Word was god
(7) New English, 1961, "what God was,the Word was"
(8) Moffatt, 1972, "the Logos was divine
(9) Reijnier Rooleeuw, 1694, "and the Word was a god"
(10) Simple English Bible, "and the Message was Deity"
(11) Hermann Heinfetter, 1863, [A]s a god the Command was"
(12) Abner Kneeland, 1822, "The Word was a God"
(13) Robert Young, 1885, (Concise Commentary) "[A]nd a God (i.e. a Divine Being) was the Word"
(14) Leicester Ambrose, 1879, "And the logos was a god"
(15) Charles A.L. Totten, 1900, "the Word was Deistic [=The Word was Godly]
(16) J.N. Jannaris, 1901, [A]nd was a god"
(17) George William Horner, 1911, [A]nd (a) God was the word"
(18) Ernest Findlay Scott, 1932, "[A]nd the Word was of divine nature"
(19) ames L. Tomanec, 1958, [T]he Word was a God"
(20) Philip Harner, 1974, "The Word had the same nature as God"
(21) Maximilian Zerwich S.J./Mary Grosvenor, 1974, "The Word was divine"
(22) Siegfried Schulz, 1975, "And a god (or, of a divine kind) was the Word"
(23) Translator's NT, 1973, "The Word was with God and shared his nature
(24) Barclay, 1976, "the nature of the Word was the same as the nature of God"
(25) Schneider, 1978, "and godlike sort was the Logos
(26) Schonfield, 1985, "the Word was divine
(27) Revised English, 1989, "what God was, the Word was
(28) Cotton Parch Version, 1970, and the Idea and God were One
(29) Scholar's Version, 1993, "The Divine word and wisdom was there with God, and it was what God was
(30) Madsen, 1994, "the Word was <EM>a divine Being"
(31) Becker, 1979, "ein Gott war das Logos" [a God/god was the Logos/logos]
(32) Stage, 1907, "Das Wort war selbst gttlichen Wesens" [The Word/word was itself a divine Being/being].
(33) Bhmer, 1910, "Es war fest mit Gott verbunden, ja selbst gttlichen Wesens" [It was strongly linked to God, yes itself divine Being/being]
(34) Thimme, 1919, "Gott von Art war das Wort" [God of Kind/kind was the Word/word]
(35) Baumgarten et al, 1920, "Gott (von Art) war der Logos" [God (of Kind/kind) was the Logos/logos]
(36) Holzmann, 1926, "ein Gott war der Gedanke" [a God/god was the Thought/thought]
(37) Rittenlmeyer, 1938, "selbst ein Gott war das Wort" [itself a God/god was the Word/word]
(38) Lyder Brun (Norw. professor of NT theology), 1945, "Ordet var av guddomsart" [the Word was of divine kind]
(39) Pfaefflin, 1949, "war von gttlicher Wucht [was of divine Kind/kind]
(40) Albrecht, 1957, "gttlichen Wesen hatte das Wort" [godlike Being/being had the Word/word]
(41) Smit, 1960, "verdensordet var et guddommelig vesen" [the word of the world was a divine being]
(42) Menge, 1961, "Gott (= gttlichen Wesens) war das Wort"[God(=godlike Being/being) was the Word/word)
(43) Haenchen, 1980, "Gott (von Art) war der Logos" [God (of Kind/kind) was the Logos/logos]
(44) Die Bibel in heutigem Deutsch, 1982, "r war bei Gott und in allem Gott gleich"[He was with God and in all like God]
(45) Haenchen (tr. By R. Funk), 1984, "divine (of the category divinity)was the Logos"
(46) Schultz, 1987, "ein Gott (oder: Gott von Art) war das Wort" [a God/god (or: God/god of Kind/kind) was the Word/word].
(47) William Temple, Archbishop of York, 1933, "And the Word was divine."
(48) John Crellius, Latin form of German, 1631, "The Word of Speech was a God"
(49) Greek Orthodox /Arabic translation, 1983, "the word was with Allah[God] and the word was a god"
(50) Ervin Edward Stringfellow (Prof. of NT Language and Literature/Drake University, 1943, "And the Word was Divine"
(51) Robert Harvey, D.D., 1931 "and the Logos was divine (a divine being
To see how Jesus was described at John 1:1 in the most ancient Coptic texts, C/H- http://www.integlogic.com/sahidica/pages/sahidicpaper1990.html
It is noteworthy that the New Testament was translated into three languages
during the Koine period (b.330 AD), that is, while the Koine (common) Greek
was still the lingua franca of the Roman world and universally understood
C/H- http://depts.washington.edu/cartah/text_archive/coptic/coptjohn.shtml
The answer of the author of the list
We know all these facts that there are many versions of John 1:1,nothing knew to me or our organization.Whats the point of this?This fact is all cleared up for us . In the last book of the Bible, namely, in Revelation 19:13, John calls him “The Word of God,” saying: “And his name is called The Word of God.” (AV; Dy) Note that his name is not called “God the Word,” but is called “The Word of God,” or God’s Word. Hence John 1:1 must mean, at most, that the Word was of God.
The snowball Trinity versus the Father Almighty http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/11/about-our-god-and-father.html
Please
share if you love the true God, Jehovah! Thank's for your time, and may
God bless you! With Christian love,
14. Yah is One. Yah is Love.: Does Hebrews 1:10-12 prove that Yeshua is Yahweh?
In Hebrews chapter 1 ,verses 10-12, the author quotes Psalm 102:25-27, and most Christians use it as proof that Yeshua is creator and hence ...
My reply to this post:
There are a new view, that this text was newer written by the author of the letter to the Hebrews.
This could be an early copyst interpolation. I consider Hebrew 1:5part b-12 an interpolation
http://bibliaantica.blogspot.ro/2014/11/enigme-descifrate-in-epistola-catre.html
Subject: If the Son is not created, how he came in existence?
Hi Mike,
I want to continue our dialog, if you wish.
You wrote me this: or they think of the Father where the Son is thought to be
created.
So, you don't believe in the Trinity, you believe that the Son is Michael the
Archangel, but you believe that the Son was not created.
Now, please explain, if the Son is not created, how he came in existence? Have God a wife, who died, or she is alive, somewhere?
You wrote: This is similar to how Adam's son was human because he came out of Adam.
Well is not similar, cause Adam had a wife. Or we know that God has not a wife. Right?
Shalom,
J.
From Mike
"Jesus is coming soon and I pray we all will be ready for His soon coming.
Thank you, I enjoyed the blog. It looks like you are from Romania.
I agree with the blog that so few know who God is. Either they think of God as
a trinity, or they think of the Father where the Son is thought to be created.
But the real truth is, that the Son of God really is the Son of God! He is
Divine like His Father, because He came out of God. This is similar to how
Adam's son was human because he came out of Adam.
Yours in Christ
Mike Brown
----
15. A response to the Arian nontrinitarians
Some brethren returned to the old path of Arians, that the holy spirit is a distinct person from God, created by the Son of God. Here is a response, till i have some time to write a response in Romanian. In Hungarian I wrote one.
What is the holy spirit?
(Holy Spirit or holy spirit?)
by Jay Dickens
"In discussions as to the identity of the holy Spirit, argumentation
generally revolves around the issue of personality or a connection with a
triune God. In some trinitarian presentations the text at Acts 5:3, 4, is used
to show that the holy Spirit is God. In Acts 5:3 Ananias and Sapphira are said
to have lied “to the holy Spirit” while in verse 4 they are said to have “lied
to God.” These sources simply ignore all the cases in the Bible where an agency
is spoken of as if doing what the person directing matters himself actually
does. The Scriptures speak of Solomon as building the temple, yet they clearly
show that he himself did not build it, did none of actual work. But it was his
project, done at his direction, and so it is attributed to him. Similarly to
lie to God is also to lie to his spirit and vice versa. But that does not make
them interchangeable. We read that “God is light.” But we would not say “Light
is God.” (1 John 1:5) So, too, we read that “God is love,” but that does not
mean that “Love is God.” (1 John 4:8) Exodus 3:2-6 states that “an angel of the
Lord [Jehovah]” appeared to Moses in a burning bush. Yet in subsequent verses
it states that God called to Moses out of the bush. Was the angel Jehovah or is
Jehovah an angel? Or was the angel simply an agency used by Jehovah? Which?
(Compare similarly Genesis 16:7, 10.)"
RELATED
11. Subject: If the Son is a son, and is not created, how he came in existence?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/subiect-re-blog-invitation.html
12. A response to the Arian nontrinitarians
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/a-response-to-arian-nontrinitarians.html
13. The Ancient Inventors of Hell's eternal torment
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/the-ancient-inventors-of-hell.html
14. THE FIRE THAT CONSUMES: "Eternal" with Words of Action
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/eternal-with-words-of-action.html
15. What is a man, that I still believe in resurrection?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/i-still-believe-in-resurrection.html
16. The Last hymn of Georg "Blaurock" 1529
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/the-last-hymn-of-georg-blaurock-1529.html
17. KNOW THESE FACTS ABOUT some men and women who mocked God
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/know-these-facts.html
18. Lazarus and the Rich Man: A literal, historical event or an extra-Biblical source?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/a-literal-historical-event-or-extra.html
19. About the "inspiration" of so called "church fathers": From where Hippolytus got it?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/the-inspiration-of-so-called-church.html
20. "The last gnostic" Origene, the head supporter of the unbiblical immortalily of the soul
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/origene-one-of-head-supporter-of.html
21. Bishop Polycarp’s last prayer
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/bishop-polycarps-last-prayer.html
22. Inquisitions: Where is the muslim and pagan inquisition?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/inquisitions.html
23. You are free, my sister, my brother, my friend?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/you-are-free-my-sister-brother-my-friend.html
24. A vow sent by
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/a-vow-sent-by-br-marcus-ampe.html
25. Why is the Gospel good news?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/why-is-gospel-good-news.html
26. Last Supper was a day earlier, scientist claims
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/last-supper-was-day-earlier-scientist.html
27. A desire
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/my-desire-what-i-believe-and-why-i.html
28. The Lord's Prayer and The Great Commission
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/an-aramaic-variant-translated-in.html
29. The Monkey's Disgrace
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/the-monkeys-disgrace.html
30. Free from sin, free from law: "for you are not under the law" (the law of Moses) Romans 6:14
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/who-are-not-under-law-of-moses.html
31. “You subscribed, Eusebius!" The traitors of Arius
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/eusebius-eusebius.html
32. Why I believe in God's existence, and why you don't have any excuse?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/why-i-believe-in-gods-existence.html
33. An old mystery from the Noah's ark time: Where is the water?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/the-noahs-ark.html
34. A question for Sabbath-keeping churches: Why is missing the Sabbath from Acts 15?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/a-question-for-sabbath-keeping-churches.html
35. About my supreme
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/about-my-supreme-desire.html
36. May I present what the Bible really teach?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/what-bible-really-teach.html
37. This is a dialog invitation: Let's talk in love and holiness
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/this-is-dialog-invitation.html
38. Who are "the other sheep" from John 10:16?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/who-are-other-sheep-from-john-1016.html
39. Adventist imagination: When God will shut the door
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/bible-student-shut-door.html
40. The Essene Text of Death Sea Scrolls
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/the-essene-text-of-death-sea-scrolls.html
41. The 2520 year theory is from William Miller, not from God
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/the-2520-year-by-william-miller.html
42. The 2520 years Gentile Times are from God or from Joshua Spalding?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/the-2520-years-gentile-times-are-from.html
43. Who were the first associated of pastor Charles Taze Russell?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/who-were-first-associated-of-pastor.html
44. Adventist linked origin of Bible Students & Jehovah's Witnesses
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/adventist-origin-of-bible-students.html
45. Charles Taze Russell early view about Nelson H. Barbour as "the chosen
vessel of God"
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/charles-taze-russell-early-view-about.html
46. A new split of the Second Adventists and the appearance of the Bible
Student movement
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2013/01/parkinson-james-bible-student-movement.html
47. Request for A.P. Pottle, "The Power of the Mind," The Golden Age
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2013/01/no-sleep.html
48. Gerard Gertoux book's excellent review: Not a Nameless God - by George L
Pullman
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2013/01/gerard-gertoux-books-excellent-review.html
49. CT Russell's wrong view about the gentile times and the great tribulation
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2013/01/ct-russell-about-gentile-times-and.html
50. JW's Splinter groups: Free Bible Students Romanian Trip Report
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2013/01/romanian-trip-report.html
51. JW's Splinter groups The Goshen Fellowship (1951 - Present)
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2013/01/the-goshen-fellowship-1951-present.html
52. Dialog about 1914 doctrine
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2013/01/dialog-meeting-on-5-of-this-month.html
53. God's people need a last reformation
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2013/01/gods-people-need-last-reformation.html
54. Bible believers, true witnesses for Almighty God, Jehovah and Lord Jesus
Christ
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2013/01/our-desire-must-be.html
55. Old Statement Of Faith
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2013/01/my-old-statement-of-faith.html
56. The Bible Student Movement and it's fractions
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2013/01/the-bible-student-movement-and-its.html
57. Archangel Michael, the Son of God
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/article-1.html
58. E.mails from Raymond Franz, former member of the Governing Body Of Jehovah's Witnesses
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/emails-from-brother-raymond-franz.html
59. Jay Dicken's 27 answer to trinitarians
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/jay-dickens-27-answer-to-trinitarians.html
60. Yah is One. Yah is Love.: Does Hebrews 1:10-12 prove that Yeshua is Yahweh?
http://waitingforthefinaltest.blogspot.ro/2012/12/yah-is-one-yah-is-love-does-hebrews-110.html
Comentarii
Trimiteți un comentariu